Naysayer – What Past Leadership Can Tell Us About Future Leaders


WAAAY over the line – Take action NOW!
October 24, 2008, 2:41 pm
Filed under: Election 2008

via Obama compared to mass murderer Charles Manson at Palin/Coleman rally in MN

This is utterly DESPICABLE. No amount of repudiation can make this right. John McCain’s contemptible campaign fostered this AND stoked these fires. Is it any wonder Colin Powell is endorsing Obama?

Contact McCain’s campaign – tell him how utterly despical this is: http://www.johnmccain.com/Contact/ Tell him you WERE undecided, but now you’re DEFINITELY voting for Obama. While you’re at it, contact the chairman of the Gutless Old Party: Chairman@GOP.com



By this standard, are we not ALL Democrats?
October 24, 2008, 2:41 pm
Filed under: Election 2008

Very well said.



Not a Maverick. Not a Reformer. Not Honest.
October 16, 2008, 12:56 am
Filed under: Election 2008 | Tags: , ,

John McCain calls himself a Washington outsider, a maverick, a reformer. His past, his actions, his record in Congress contradict that in a big, big way.

Saying it doesn’t make it so, John.

(Just in case, though… I’m a billionaire… Damn.)

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine



GOP – Monty Python Could Have Written That
October 15, 2008, 1:46 am
Filed under: Election 2008

In John Cleese’s recent interview regarding Sarah Palin, he stated that “Monty Python could have written that.” That very thought occurred to me as I watched Sarah Palin’s speech at the GOP convention. I started this post that night. It has languished since, but now, here it is. Thank you, John Cleese, for the inspiration as well as the title.

King Arthur: Your arm’s off!
The Black Knight: No it isn’t!

For the past 8 years, the Republican party has made up its own “truth” and spoon fed it to a gullible public. At times the real truth was so blatant, so obvious as to be undeniable. But deny it, they did – and do.

Look, you stupid bastard, you’ve got no arms left!
Yes I have!

The truth has been out there, available for anyone to see… but many people didn’t or wouldn’t seek it out – or even consider it when it stared them in the face. They believed what they chose to believe and elected the worst president in this nation’s history – twice.

That’s how the GOP has managed to fool most of the people, most of the time — by lying to people, then sticking doggedly to their ridiculous stories. Like Monty Python, it would be downright funny… except for all the lost lives, homes, jobs, liberties, and the integrity of this country in the world community.

Customer: That parrot is definitely deceased. And when I bought it, not half an hour ago, you assured me that its lack of movement was due to it bein’ tired and shagged out after a long squawk.

Pet Shop Clerk: It’s prob’ly pinin’ for the fjords!

Look, I took the liberty of examining that parrot and I discovered that the only reason that it had been sittin’ on its perch in the first place was that it had been nailed there!

Of course it was nailed there! Otherwise it’d muscle up to those bars and VOOM!

This parrot wouldn’t “voom!” if I put 4000 volts through it. It’s bleeding demised!

It’s not, it’s, it’s pinin’!

Now, the GOP is doing it again, using the same tried and true methods. The campaign trail is littered with statements by and about John McCain (and at the expense of Barack Obama) that are blatantly contradictory to McCain’s senate voting record and archived news stories. But the GOP really kicked the misleading into high gear when it unleashed it’s lipstick-adorned pitbull, Gov. Sarah Palin. If McCain and Palin were wooden puppets, their noses would now reach from Washington D.C. to Nome, Alaska (and they could keep a nostril on Russia from there!)

Below, you’ll find a long list of some of the McCain campaign’s many lies. Each links to a reliable source for the verifiable truth. Note that this list is far from complete; these are just some of the whoppers. A complete list (if that’s possible) is available here.

This parrot is no more! It has ceased to be! It’s expired and gone to meet its maker! This is a late parrot! It’s a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace; if you hadn’t nailed it to the perch, it would be pushin’ up the daisies! He’s run down the curtain and joined the bleeding choir invisible! This is an ex-parrot!
Clerk: Well, we better replace those lying Republicans, then.

[I paraphrased that last bit.]

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine



67 Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
October 14, 2008, 10:29 pm
Filed under: Election 2008 | Tags: , ,

In addition to the two Nobel prize winning economists who previously endorsed Barack Obama, the following Nobel Laureates for Science have now endorsed Barack Obama for President:

Yoichiro Nambu, Physics, 2008
Martin Chalfie, Chemistry, 2008
Roger Tsien, Chemistry, 2008
Mario R. Capecchi, Medicine, 2007
Oliver Smithies, Medicine, 2007
Roger Kornberg, Chemistry, 2006
Craig C. Mello, Medicine, 2006
John L. Hall, Physics, 2005
Richard R Schrock, Chemistry, 2005
Robert H. Grubbs, Chemistry, 2005
Richard Axel, Medicine, 2004
Linda B. Buck, Medicine, 2004
Frank Wilczek, Physics, 2004
David Gross, Physics, 2004
Alexei Arikosov, Physics, 2003
Peter Agre, Chemistry, 2003
H. Robert Horvitz, Medicine, 2002
John B. Fenn, Chemistry, 2002
Riccardo Giacconi, Physics, 2002
Leland H. Hartwell, Medicine, 2001
Eric R. Kandel, Medicine, 2000
Paul Greengard, Medicine, 2000
Louis Ignarro, Medicine, 1998
Walter Kohn, Chemistry, 1998
Daniel C.Tsui, Physics, 1998
Stanley B. Prusiner, Medicine, 1997
Douglas D. Osheroff, Physics, 1996
Robert F. Curl, Chemistry, 1996
Robert Richardson, Physics, 1996
Sherwood Rowland, Chemistry, 1995
Eric Wieschaus, Medicine, 1995
Alfred G. Gilman, Medicine, 1994
Joseph H. Taylor Jr., Physics, 1993
Edmond H. Fischer, Medicine, 1992
Jerome I. Friedman, Physics, 1990
E. Donnall Thomas, Medicine, 1990
Sidney Altman, Chemistry, 1989
J. Michael Bishop, Medicine, 1989
Norman F. Ramsey, Physics, 1989
Harold Varmus, Medicine, 1989
Leon M. Lederman, Physics, 1988
Johann Diesenhofer, Chemistry, 1988
Dudley Herschbach, Chemistry, 1986
Stanley Cohen, Medicine, 1986
Michael S. Brown, Medicine, 1985
Joseph Goldstein, Medicine, 1985
Roald Hoffmann, Chemistry, 1981
N. Bloembergen, Physics, 1981
Baruj Benacerraf, Medicine, 1980
Paul Berg, Chemistry, 1980
James W. Cronin, Physics, 1980
Val Fitch, Physics, 1980
Walter Gilbert, Chemistry, 1980
Sheldon L. Glashow, Physics, 1979
Robert W. Wilson, Physics, 1978
Roger Guillemin, Medicine, 1977
Philip W. Anderson, Physics, 1977
Burton Richter, Physics, 1976
David Baltimore, Medicine, 1975
Leon Cooper, Physics, 1972
Murray Gell-Man, Physics, 1969
Marshall Nirenberg, Medicine, 1968
Charles H. Townes, Physics, 1964
James D. Watson, Medicine, 1962
Donald A. Glaser, Physics, 1960

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine



First time voter – at 76
October 14, 2008, 11:43 am
Filed under: Election 2008

I love my father-in-law dearly; he hasn’t been “like a father” to me – he has been a father to me. I haven’t always seen eye-to-eye, politically, with him, though. So when I heard anti-Obama/pro-McCain rumblings from him, I did what any good son would do- I confronted him with the truth. Not just my opinion of the truth, but bona fide, verifiable truth – with sources to back it up (which is what this blog is all about.)

I was careful not to hound him or turn every conversation into a political one. In fact, I never brought up politics in conversation. A simple e-mail now and then, with a link to a blog post – and not too many such e-mails. I honestly didn’t know if he read them, or if he followed the links… until today.

Today I got word that my father-in-law, at 76 years old, is registering to vote for the first time in his life. My mother-in-law, another non-voter for many years, is registering as well. Once registered, they’ll be casting their ballots early – for Barack Obama.

My mother-in-law says that I am responsible for this. He did read my blog, and it motivated him to finally register and vote.

I can’t begin to convey the pride I feel over this. I don’t know how many people this blog has reached, and I don’t know whether it has made a difference among those who have visited, but it reached two people whom I care about deeply, and it made a difference with them.

Make no mistake- it has all been worth it.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine



RAGE
October 9, 2008, 10:55 pm
Filed under: Election 2008 | Tags:

Powerful new piece from Brave New Films. John McCain’s temperament is absolutely not conducive to being the leader of a nation with a vast nuclear arsenal.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine



Another McCain Lie- Obama’s “Billions to Oil Companies”
October 8, 2008, 11:39 am
Filed under: Election 2008 | Tags: , , ,

McCain recycled a misleading claim from Sen. Hillary Clinton’s primary campaign, charging Obama with voting to give “billions” to oil companies:

McCain: By the way, my friends, I know you grow a little weary with this back-and-forth. It was an energy bill on the floor of the Senate loaded down with goodies, billions for the oil companies, and it was sponsored by Bush and Cheney. You know who voted for it? You might never know. That one. You know who voted against it? Me.

McCain is referring to the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which Obama did in fact vote for. Clinton raised this same charge against Obama during the Democratic primaries. It was misleading then and it’s equally misleading now.

In fact, according to a Congressional Research Service report, more tax breaks were taken away from oil companies than were given. Overall, the act resulted in a small net tax increase on the oil industry:

Congressional Research Service: The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05, P.L. 109-58) included several oil and gas tax incentives, providing about $2.6 billion of tax cuts for the oil and gas industry. In addition, EPACT05 provided for $2.9 billion of tax increases on the oil and gas industry, for a net tax increase on the industry of nearly $300 million over 11 years.

As we said last year, the bill did contain $14.3 billion in tax breaks, but most of those went to electric utilities, and nuclear, and also to alternative fuels research
and subsidies for energy-efficient cars, homes and buildings – not to the oil industry.

from FactCheck.org article FactChecking Debate No. 2

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.